新闻中心 分类>>
为什么 £1 亿转会失败的 Wirtz 在利物浦比拜仁获得免费通行证(为何“£1亿转会失败者”Wirtz在利物浦比在拜仁更受宽待)
2026-01-01
返回列表 Analyzing sports journalism question
I see the user has asked a sports journalism question in Chinese about a transfer involving Florian Wirtz and Liverpool. The mention of a £100 million failed transfer and a "free pass" at Liverpool compared to Bayern suggests an exploration of why Wirtz might have a better opportunity at Liverpool. I think I should provide analysis on various aspects like playing styles, squad needs, and dynamics in the current football climate, especially considering it's late 2025 and my last knowledge cutoff was in October 2024.Evaluating Wirtz's potential fit
I'm considering how Wirtz could fit into Liverpool's lineup. Liverpool lacks a pure number 10, and Wirtz could play several roles, like left winger or attacking midfielder. At Bayern, he might face challenges due to overlapping positions with players like Musiala. I think tactical freedom at Liverpool would allow him more creativity, while Bayern has strict hierarchical expectations. Currently, Liverpool has Arne Slot, who utilizes a 4-2-3-1/4-3-3 formation, which could suit Wirtz's style well.Analyzing Wirtz's transfer dynamics
At Bayern, the 4-2-3-1 formation places Musiala at the number 10, which could force Wirtz into a wider role or as an 8, making it redundant. The price politics within the Bundesliga complicate things since Bayer Leverkusen would hesitate to sell to a direct rival like Bayern. Liverpool might have a smoother path to acquiring Wirtz. Contractually, he’s tied until 2027/2028, with a preference for an international move. The pressure at Bayern for immediate results contrasts with Liverpool's environment, where star signings may have more leeway.Examining Wirtz's potential role and transfer dynamics
Wirtz usually operates in the left half space, which could mean he might either pair with Salah or take over as the main creator if Salah moves to Saudi Arabia. The communication style between clubs plays a role too; Bayern tends to have leaks, while Liverpool is more discreet, potentially giving Liverpool a "free pass" in media perception.
If Leverkusen decides to sell, it’s likely they would prefer a sale to foreign clubs rather than Bayern due to rivalry. I think the term "免费通行证" indicates an easier transfer process from Leverkusen's perspective and among fans.Summarizing Wirtz's fit and transfer considerations
Squad fit: Liverpool needs a pure 10, while Bayern has Musiala. Under Slot’s 4-2-3-1, Wirtz could fill a creative role at Liverpool but might be redundant at Bayern.
Role and ball dominance: Wirtz thrives in half-space. At Bayern, the focus is on Musiala and Kane, but Liverpool allows for better interplay with players like Diaz and Gakpo.
Market dynamics: Leverkusen could command a high fee due to Premier League cash, but there isn’t a known release clause.
Adaptation pressure: Bayern expects immediate success, while Liverpool is in a transitional phase post-Salah.
Staying in Germany could attract media scrutiny, while at Liverpool, Wirtz might become the face of a new project.

Are Liverpool actively pursuing Wirtz? Are Bayern leading the chase? If the user wants a deeper look, I’ll ask them to specify what angle interests them.
This summary is based on public reporting up to late 2024, so I’ll check their timeframe too.
下面是常被提到的几条关键原因,解释为什么同样是追弗洛里安·维尔茨,利物浦相比拜仁更像“绿灯多、阻力小”。
竞品与政治成本:勒沃库森极不愿把核心卖给直接联赛对手,尤其是拜仁;国内转会会被加“德甲溢价”和舆论压力。卖去英超既能拿到创纪录价,又不会在联赛里被自己养的刀反杀。

位置与角色冲突:拜仁的10号/左半空间已经有穆西亚拉(还有穆勒的历史角色),维尔茨来了必然重叠、要么挤走核心、要么被迫改位。利物浦在阿尔内·斯洛特体系下更缺一个天然的中前腰/左内侧组织者,适配度更高、路线更清晰。
战术自由度与建队话语权:拜仁是既定的凯恩+穆西亚拉轴心,球权分配和走位模板相对稳定;利物浦重塑期(萨拉赫未来、前场结构)给维尔茨作为进攻枢纽的空间更大,能围绕他设计的战术与容错会更多。
转会路径偏好:多方报道提到维尔茨团队更倾向先出国挑战,再考虑回德(与哈弗茨当年的路径相似);这让英超豪门天然优先于拜仁。
价格与议价:对拜仁,勒沃库森会加“同联赛溢价”且很难一次性完成巨额现金;对英超俱乐部,结构化支付更灵活、商业回报预期更高,卖方更容易点头,这种“易成交”的感觉常被解读为“免费通行证”。
舆论与耐心曲线:拜仁对大手笔引援的即战力要求极高,任何磨合期都会被放大审视;利物浦在更新周期内对顶级天才的适应期更有耐心,外部压力相对小。
小提醒:
- “£1亿失败报价/传闻”各家消息出处不一,细节会随窗口变化。如果你有具体时间点或报道来源,我可以据此对比当时两家的阵容、财务与交易结构,给到更精确的评估。

